Author: Dan

Dear Grantland: Please Do Not Spoil Shit For Us

Dear Grantland,

I enjoy reading your work. You hire talented writers who make me laugh and make me think on a daily basis.

However, I have a humble request that, in the future, you do not do what you did with your Justified recap of March 6, 2013 (which is pictured below, with POTENTIAL SPOILERS BLACKED OUT):

grantland

I understand that the spoiler in question was a big moment for the episode, and, for that matter, the season (it concerns the season-long mystery that the long arc has been focused on), and that therefore the recap would likely be built around said reveal.

However, for that very reason, I hope that you will suggest to your writers in the future that they hold spoilers until after the jump, so that someone who hasn’t seen the episode yet and is just scrolling down the page to see what post he/she wants to read doesn’t accidentally glimpse enough of the spoiler to ruin the episode for him/herself.

If I had clicked on “Read Full Post” and then spoiled the episode for myself, then great, fine. That’s my fault. But this is on the front of the Hollywood Prospectus page.  I was trying to scroll down to the late Tuesday posts to see if there was anything I missed from yesterday that I wanted to read, and instead, I learned a crucial detail that I was planning on enjoying discovering when I watched the episode of Justified tonight.

In exchange for this consideration, I hereby pledge that for any show I would like to read the recap of, I will absolutely click on “Read Full Post”. I won’t skip it. Promise!

Just don’t make it harder to watch an episode of television unspoiled, please. Twitter and Facebook don’t need the help.

 

That is all. Thank you for your time.

 

Sincerely,

Dan

The Dangers of Self-Diagnostic Statistical Analysis, Part 1

This is the first in a potentially multi-part series of short insights that occur to me when I take a look at my life from a statistical point of view.

The Statistic:  For about a five year period in my life, every woman I dated subsequently met/dated/married their husband immediately following our “relationship”.

How Weird Is That?  Weird enough that I still remember it several years later.

What Does It Mean?  Hard to say, exactly. First off, it’s important to point out that this isn’t an inherently large sample size, so there’s a pretty big chance of this being somewhat random.

It is important to point out, however, that the length of the relationship doesn’t seem to matter, since these “relationships” varied from a single date (which is why “relationship” is in quotes – that doesn’t really count as much of anything) to not quite a year.

It is probably more of an insight into the type of women I was meeting/dating at the time – or at least, where most of them tended to be in their lives – in all likelihood, they were starting to get to the point where they wanted to settle down, whereas I most certainly was not (a fact which directly led to the end of one of these aforementioned relationships). Verification of this theory, however, seems unlikely, as the women did not respond to requests for comment.

What Have I Learned?  Not much, probably. Besides understanding what this says about where my own emotional space was during this period of time (when marriage/settling down was not something I was particularly worried about), this statistical trend probably is more about my greater social circle at the time than anything else. For example, further analysis doesn’t suggest that my “type” has changed significantly, which means that the circumstances around me are more than likely responsible for the shift.

On that note, the end of this period in time also happened to coincide with moderate changes in living, financial, and social circumstances, so really all this does is point to a specific point in my life as a pivot moment for me.  But more on that later.

So Was This Exercise Worth It?  Maybe. It’s an interesting way to consider the past, I think. If I can identify other interesting trends I’ll continue.

 

The Inherent Beauty Of “The Walking Dead”

(Note: I generally don’t like the idea of doing individual episode recaps, and this isn’t supposed to be that, although it may drift into recap territory at times, so be forewarned. Also, spoilers.)

It seems strange to consider that an episode of The Walking Dead could be described as beautiful, but last night’s episode, “Clear”, was that. Unlike most of this season (which has moved through storylines and characters at a breakneck pace), last night’s episode focused solely on one storyline, in one small town, with just four characters (five, if you count the unnamed hiker who bookends the episode): Rick, Carl, Michonne, and Morgan (who, if you don’t recall, was the man who saved Rick’s life in the pilot, along with his young son, Duane. Morgan was the one who Rick gave the radio to, and promised to try and stay in contact.).

With just four characters, and incredibly basic wants from a narrative perspective (Rick and the gang are looking for weapons, and then come upon Morgan; later, Carl decides that he wants to get something for his sister from another part of town), the episode is able to break into two two-person relationships: Rick and Morgan, and Carl and Michonne.

With the history that Rick and Morgan share, it makes sense that Rick would want to save his first friend in the apocalypse. What follows over the course of the hour is a long, emotional exploration of two men who have managed to survive thus far, but at great personal cost, and the difference between the one who still has some sense of hope (although as Rick and company demonstrate with the unnamed hiker, not as much empathy for strangers as before) and the one who has lost all hope, to the point where he won’t even kill himself, because he feels that he still deserves punishment for his failures.

In the other story, Carl and Michonne go on what seems like a simple errand – Carl wants to retrieve a photo of his family from a small diner nearby, because he wants his sister to have a photo of her mother – although this task, also, reminds us that Carl is still a child who misses his mother, despite his best efforts to remain emotionally distant for much of the season. It also finally gives us a little bit of humanity from Michonne, who up to this point has generally tried to make herself the most unlikeable person in the history of the apocalypse.

Given the simplicity of the narrative in the episode, and the need for long, emotional, focused two person scenes, it makes perfect sense that Scott Gimple (who has written some of the best episodes over the course of the three seasons, and has been named the new showrunner for season 4) was tapped to write the episode, and he’s able to construct a compelling, entertaining, and yes, beautiful episode out of essentially two relationships.

On a larger level, the episode succeeds because it is a reminder of what the show can represent – it’s an episode with little zombie threat; indeed, most of the zombie attacks are off-screen – the first is cut away from once Rick fires the first bullet, and the second primarily happens with Michonne inside a diner, again, off-screen – we don’t need to see the actual gore and action to know that our protagonists are capable of handling these threats, and instead gives more room for character moments to occur. At its best, The Walking Dead has always been a show about people and their relationships – not the preachy moral questions of Dale or the evil vs. less evil shootout that we’re leading up to in the final episodes of season 3, but this. Two men, in a room. One still has hope, at least for now. The other has lost his, possibly never to return. It’s a reminder that amidst all the horror, the blood, the gore, the endless headshots, deep down, these are still people, and that their problems, their moral qualms, heightened though they may be, aren’t nearly as different from our own as we might expect.